TaylorMade Burner 2.0 Review

When I first swung the Taylormade Burner 2.0, I didn’t expect it to completely change my game. After months spent on the range and dozens of rounds, I can say this Taylormade Burner 2.0 Review is honest. And yes, I still game them in 2025.

When it comes to game-improvement drivers, the TaylorMade Burner 2.0 remains a fan favorite. Even years after its release, golfers still praise its forgiveness, distance, and classic design.

My First Impression

I found a near-mint 4‑AW set for about $150 used. I’d been playing old irons and wanted something more forgiving. The Taylormade Burner 2.0 Review starts there finding a bargain and hoping for a boost.

When I first held them, the heads felt chunky. But that chrome finish on the soles and toes looked sharp. I felt like I was stepping up to something special.

Learning Curve & Adjustment

The first couple of range sessions were weird. My stock-fit shafts looked right but didn’t feel right. I was pulling or thinning shots. Then I learned fitting matters—even used clubs need that personal touch. As one golfer shared:

“I thought since I had stock clubs before a stock setup would work nicely… Now I am usually pulling the shot left… I’m starting to wonder if the … irons are less forgiving than I had initially thought.” reddit.com

So I switched to stiff steel shafts. Almost immediately, the consistency came back. Lesson learned: even older clubs deserve proper setup.

From day one, the forgiveness stood out. My mishits were no longer punished. The ball stayed in play, even off-center. That’s not marketing hype—that’s real turf confidence.

I resonated with one Redditor:

“Best starter set… Extremely forgiving… Misshits won’t matter with those.”

On course, I thought it was me—poor shots, not the irons. But those irons flat-out kept me calm.

Distance Gains I Actually Felt

Before Burner 2.0, I got 150 yards with a 7‑iron. With these, I saw 160–165 yards on flush strikes.

A blogger also measured a 175‑yard shot:

“I play about 100 rounds a year… a 7 iron… carried 155‑160 and rolled to 175.”

My launch monitor confirmed it too—strong lofts + thin faces add yardage. I didn’t just see the numbers—I felt the extra distance in real play.

Ball Flight and Control

These aren’t blade irons, but you can shape shots. I started by trying gentle draws and fades on purpose. With time, I got better at it.

One user on GolfWRX said:

“I was shocked… my iron game got more accurate and versatile… I’ve played better iron shots than at any time in my life.”

That was me. I wasn’t flipping my wrist. I just let the design help. The low center-of-gravity and inverted cone tech made that possible.

My set is now over 12 years old. The finish shows wear. Black paint has chipped and the grey sweet spot is masked with marks. But none of it affects performance.

As one reviewer said:

“After a few buckets, the black paint held its color… grey sweet spot… evidence of pure hits and they will increase my confidence.”

I actually like that personalized scuffing—it tells my story.

The biggest risk? Shaft or grip wear. Mine broke once and needed replacement. It’s easy: they used Dynamic Gold steel shafts.

Competing in 2025: Are “Burner 2.0” Still Good?

There are newer irons with carbon caps and even lighter builds. But my Burner 2.0 still hits farther than many blades and performs similarly to newer game-improvement irons.

Redditors confirm:

“Burner 2.0 irons from around 2011… just as good as anything on the market today within the same category.”

When someone switched to SIM2 Max, they noticed minor gains but said:

“The Burner 2.0’s are still doing me proud.”

For me, that’s gold. I get performance without paying new‑iron prices.

Pros & Cons: My Personal Take

👍 What I Love

• Real forgiveness: Keeps me in play, even on off‑center hits.
• More distance: I get consistent yardage gains, noticeable on every round.
• Decent workability: I can shape low punches in the wind.
• Solid sound/feel: Pop on flush hits, no harsh feel on mis-hits.
• Durable & affordable: Holds up year after year—wear only adds character.

👎 The Trade-Offs

• Chunkier head: Not sleek like modern builds; takes getting used to.
• Stock look outdated: Paint chips show age.
• Feel isn’t for elite players: Some prefer forged softness.
• Left‑handed sets rare: Finding one in mint shape is tough.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. Is the TaylorMade Burner 2.0 good for beginners?

Yes! Its forgiveness and ease of use make it perfect for new golfers.

2. What’s the difference between Burner 2.0 and Burner 2.0 TP?

The TP version has an adjustable hosel for loft customization, while the standard version does not.

3. How much does the TaylorMade Burner 2.0 cost in 2025?

Used models go for $100-$200, depending on condition.

4. What shaft flex should I get?

• Regular flex for swing speeds under 90 mph
• Stiff flex for speeds over 90 mph